Hollywood Innovations Group: New Lawsuit Accuses Netflix of Weaponizing Latest Technology to Steal Blockbuster Screenplay, Calls Streaming Giant’s Business Practices into Question

Netflix accused of using cutting-edge dubbing technologies to reap tens of millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Amid a national fascination with South Korean megahit “Squid Game,” a lawsuit filed today against Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) alleges that the streaming giant weaponized innovations in language-dubbing technology to illegally produce one of its most-watched titles. It is yet another in a string of lawsuits filed recently against Netflix focusing on its questionable business practices.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for Central District of California by entertainment company Hollywood Innovations Group (HIG), the lawsuit shines a harsh light on Netflix’s unscrupulous business practices and alleges it willfully violated the same copyright laws it routinely enforces against its own competitors. It also illustrates the power of new dubbing technologies to seamlessly adapt video content across dozens of languages. The technology helps expose broader audiences to global content, but Netflix has quickly found a way to leverage it to capture the lucrative and highly competitive Asian market.

Netflix co-CEO and Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos has identified South Korea as a content hot spot for American film producers, believing it serves as a barometer of success for the broader Asian market, and the company has invested $500 million there this year alone. The lawsuit alleges that the lure of profits and opportunities to raise its profile as the leading outlet for Korean content motivated Netflix’s eagerness to exploit the movie in question despite violation of U.S. copyright laws.

Law firms Bay Advocacy PLLC and One LLP, on behalf of HIG, filed the lawsuit against Netflix and Korean producers Perspective Pictures, Zip Cinema, and Kakao Entertainment, which recently acquired Zip Cinema. It centers around a compelling and timely screenplay written by screenwriter Matt Naylor in 2018, well before the global COVID-19 pandemic struck in March 2020. Ironically, the story focuses on a young man’s struggle for survival and the resulting mayhem when he is forced to self-isolate during a global viral pandemic.

The complaint alleges that Naylor initially entered into an agreement with Zip Cinema and Perspective Pictures, granting them the right to produce only a single, feature-length, Korean-language motion picture based on his script. In addition to limiting Zip’s and Perspective’s rights to a single Korean-language movie, the agreement also expressly reserved to Naylor the right to make and distribute an English-language movie based on the script. Naylor later sold all rights, including but not limited to the rights to make movies based on the script in all non-Korean languages, to producer Rabih Aridi, who, in turn, transferred those rights to HIG. According to the lawsuit, HIG began producing “Alone,” an English-language film based on the script in 2019 with an A-list cast that included Donald Sutherland and Tyler Posey in starring roles. It had an October 2020 theatrical release, with additional plans to license the film to Netflix or another leading U.S. streaming service.

At the same time, Zip and Perspective exercised their rights in South Korea to produce a Korean-language movie called “#Saraitda.” The movie was a huge success in South Korea, enjoying the highest first-day viewership of any film since the start of the pandemic.

The film’s overseas success apparently piqued Netflix’s interest. The complaint alleges that, despite having a clear understanding that the rights to produce or distribute an English-language version of the film were excluded in their agreement, Zip Cinema and Perspective Pictures quickly colluded with Netflix to use advanced dubbing capabilities to put the film in English and numerous other languages and unlawfully release it under the title “#Alive” before HIG could release “Alone.” “#Alive” quickly became a box office smash for Netflix. Not surprisingly, given the actions of Netflix and its partners, “Alone” floundered.

“New dubbing innovations have made content from around the world more accessible than ever, creating a lucrative new market for streaming services and a frenzied scramble to mine content from abroad to bring to domestic audiences. But, as with any new Gold Rush, the lure of quick and easy profits can tempt those on the ground to violate established property rights,” said John Tehranian, a founding partner at One LLP. “As this suit alleges, Netflix positioned itself at the forefront of the new dubbing marketplace by innovating through infringement.”

The lawsuit asserts that Zip and Perspective colluded with Netflix, which used its new dubbing technology to distribute unlawfully dubbed versions of the movie, under the name “#Alive,” in the United States and dozens of other markets before HIG could release “Alone,” thereby earning tens of millions of dollars in profits. As the complaint explains, even after HIG put Netflix on notice that it was violating HIG’s copyright, Netflix continued exploiting its infringing release and knowingly decimated the commercial prospects for “Alone” in the process.

The Hollywood Reporter has noted that Netflix’s investment in new dubbing technologies has grown, on average, between 25% and 35% annually for the past few years. While dubbed titles are customary overseas, the U.S. market has largely found them undesirable. But Netflix has banked on advancements in this area for years, bulking up its dubbing capabilities to improve the quality of its dubbed titles. And subscribers are clearly taking notice, with English versions of films and shows like “Money Heist” and “Squid Game” turning into blockbusters.

By the time “Alone” premiered, audiences around the world had already streamed “#Alive” in English (and 30 other non-Korean languages), rendering “Alone” commercially unviable with a massive lost opportunity to monetize its rightful property. As a result, the illicit release of “#Alive” in English thoroughly undermined HIG’s ability to secure support for its film, costing the company millions of dollars in lost revenues at a time when the film’s subject matter would have resonated with global audiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“With ‘Alone,’ we spared no expense to ensure producing a quality film,” Aridi said. “We loved the script and hired an experienced director and A-list actors. We were pleased with the way everything went throughout the production and post-production processes, until of course, we realized that the rights to our script were clearly violated. More shocking was Netflix’s complete dismissal of what happened. It was like having something stolen from under our noses and seeing the thief laugh all the way to the bank.”

According to the lawsuit, Netflix garnered considerable profits and value from its unlawful distribution of “#Alive” in English and other languages and is believed to be in discussions for a forthcoming television series based on the movie. HIG seeks a portion of Netflix’s monthly subscriber revenue generated by its illegal conduct, as well as an order to permanently prohibit the three companies from copying, reproducing, exhibiting, displaying, promoting, advertising, distributing, or selling, or any other form of dealing or transaction in or exploitation of, any and all dubbed or subtitled versions of “#Alive,” as well as any and all other unauthorized derivative works.

The case is Hollywood Innovations Group, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., Zip Cinema Co., Ltd., Perspective Pictures Co., Ltd., and Kakao Entertainment Corp. A copy of the complaint is available upon request and the attorneys are available for media interviews.

Contacts

Laura Gingiss

Baretz+Brunelle

lgingiss@baretzbrunelle.com
773-469-1059